By
Steve Amoia and Andrew T. Durham
The American Thinker
July 6, 2008
Even as something as monumental
as the twilight of the American way of life stares us all in the
face, some time should be spent on the arguably trivial point of the
way we dress ourselves. It has been said "The clothing makes the
man". Well, that may be. But today the man makes the clothing...or
males, anyway. More, they design it. The point is that, coupled with
the complete lack of common courtesy, common decency and common
sense in this waning culture, the "insult to injury" shows itself in
what we can now call our National Dishevelment.
Not too long ago the unshaven
look became the norm. Now, multiple face piercings are a plus in
some industries (albeit not in the industries involving
electrical work). The simple civility of showing respect to
others by respecting your appearance - which has been replaced
by so-called "fashion" - has been lost. Apparently the need has
arisen for our populace to express themselves by how closely
they can mimic the homeless.
Have you ever see those old newsreels of American baseball
games? All of the spectators were dressed to the nines. Compare
that to what we see today. People don't respect themselves in
the same way. It is as if they go to great strides to dress
down, sloppily, or to follow the latest fashion trends by
someone in Milan or Paris. Who then changes their minds next
year to tell us what is now in fashion. As Forrest Gump might
have said, "Shallow is as shallow does." But designers cater to
an appetite to conform. Even in the most self-absorbed place on
earth: North America. If a famous fashion designer said, "Men
should wear Fedoras, and women should wear white gloves," guess
what we would see on the streets on America? Rugged
individualism, aka "The Marlboro Man," has yielded to robotic
conformity based upon the judgment of strangers.
Adults Who Dress Like Children
For example, adult men wearing
baseball caps backwards and indoors, failure to comb their hair
properly, and wearing dress shirts outside of their trousers.
Adult women showing inappropriate bare skin, undergarments,
tattoos in an office setting or in public. And we will politely
dance around those with enormous (as the British would say)
"sit-upons" crammed into tight jeans. In the United States,
there is a general lack of respect and civility for other
people. We convey that by how we dress. Sadly, the standard has
declined in massive proportions. "There is no more civility in
this society." Coach Joe Paterno on "The Charlie Rose Show."
That is so true in so many ways. And never.....EVER...complement
someone on how they look. The severe irony of this is that they
will say "What do you mean by that?". Which means two things: a)
they know they look ridiculous and b) you're headed for a
harassment suit, pick the category.
Why Has Prison Culture Gone
Mainstream?
Andrew was walking down the street recently, and a police
officer was talking to a rookie, explaining the real reason why
young men wear their pants halfway down. Such a display is a
prison code, which means a willingness to engage in a certain
activity. Andrew - unable to let this go - stopped and said how
pleased he was that someone knew the real reason for that
behavior. But why was the behavior adopted and subsequently
accepted in the first place? The same with torn jeans, dirty
sweat pants (and don't get us started on the backward baseball
cap) that used to be associated with personal shame and lack of
communal respect are now common fare in public. Is Sunday "best"
even a viable option any further? No, because anything related
to Sunday has been rendered filth by the ACLU. And, as we all
know, they run Newspeak.
Tattoos in Suburbia
It seems that if you don't have a tattoo, or "body art,"' it is
the exception. Suburban women, with kids in tow, have a new
acceptable fashion statement: The "tramp stamp." Or images
sketched on their bare shoulders. What message does that send to
their children? Add low rise jeans that leave nothing to the
imagination, along with blouses that are not tucked in. Perhaps
in strict Islamic societies, women cover themselves because they
understand that certain things are not for the whole world to
see. But in North America, what used to be acceptable at the
beach is now seen routinely in offices or the local shopping
malls. What was de rigueur in red light districts is now as
common as a barber shop on Main Street.
Flip Flops at the White House
In 2005, a group of college students from Northwestern
University's womens championship lacrosse team went to the White
House. In a photograph that was widely circulated, many were
wearing flip flops. Parents spend thousands of dollars on
college tuition so that their children can attend a "good
school," but is it too much trouble to teach them to show the
President of the United States a modicum of respect? Were it 10
years earlier, it was apparent that clothing was optional in the
Oval Office, however.
In a recent
photo by the Politico, Congressional staffers were
seen changing their flip flops before entering the Longworth
House Office Building. "Robert Primus has a pet peeve he is
reminded of between May and September. 'I actually have a
problem with how most offices dress or how they allow their
offices to dress,' said Primus, chief of staff for Rep. Michael
E. Capuano (D-Mass.). 'I don't care if it's summertime or not. I
always say that staff should not look like tourists' he added."
The Workplace
Work is not a playground or an extension of our homes.
Despite those who receive constant calls for personal
matters, or who bring their private lives into full public
view. It is curious to watch shows such as "Mad Men" to see
what was an acceptable dress code back in the 1960s compared
to now. If you walk into a McDonald's, you will see the
staff dressed very neatly and with ties in many cases. It
sends the message that they have self-respect, along with a
high regard for their customers. Despite earning minimum
wage, they display a much higher standard than we see in
"Casual Corporate America." Because wouldn't we expect
jeans, tee shirts, and flip flops at the most famous fast
food restaurant in the world? They don't have to sell us
anything except the food, but they go the extra mile. But,
alas, this is not consistent in all McDonald's. Nor is the
quality of the food. What you're selling should be reflected
by the people selling it, should it not?
Is it too much to ask outside of McDonald's? Is that too
much to ask in an era of political correctness and the
suffocation of values for the simple tapestry of appearing
with genuine character to our fellows to have at least some
meaning?
"The difference between style and fashion is quality." -
Giorgio Armani
"I dress for the image. Not for myself, not for the public,
not for fashion, not for men." - Marlene
Dietrich
"Got to be good looking
‘cause he's so hard to see.." - Lennon/McCartney
"I see that the fashion wears out more apparel than the
man." - William Shakespeare
"A fashion is nothing but an induced epidemic." - George
Bernard Shaw
But let us close (clothes?) this
erudite commentary with the eternal Dante:
"When I had journeyed half of
our life's way, I found myself within a shadowed forest, for
I had lost the path that does not stray. Ah, it is hard to
speak of what it was, that savage forest dense and
difficult, which even in recall renews my fear: so bitter -
death is hardly more severe! But to retell the good
discovered there, I'll also tell of other things I saw." -
Dante's Inferno, Canto I.
Dante had no idea. He didn't have
to walk behind some people. And McDonald's was but a dream.
Steve Amoiai's website
is
sanstefano.com;
Andrew T. Durham's is
andrewtdurham.blogspot.com/ |